Re: To Lawmoe

[ Read Follow-ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Custody Reform Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by:

Lawmoe

on April 29, 2006 at 19:37:50:

Wow. That is a bad result gien the amount of documentation you appear to have had. It would seem to me that it may have been an appealable order. At least it would have been around here, particularly considering the harsh consequences of an imputatin of income.

In fact, I just appealled a case wit the same issue except the documentation was poor and the person seeking the reduction returned to school to seek a career change. As a result, the court ruled that her job search was a pretense only since she was going from a law related job to school teaching.

In that case, she was in charge of a corporate litigation departmenst as a non-lawyer and with no formal legal training. The coproration restructured and he job was filled by a lawyer. Our argument was that she was exceeding her job skills in the former position and there was no realistic likelihood of finding a similar job since most were filled by lawyter. The case is hurt by the fact that she did not look for a job very actively until her severalnce expired almost 6 months later and, at that time, she had already enrolled in school.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name / Nickname:
Email:

Subject:

Comments:

[ Read Follow-ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Custody Reform Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]