Re: Uh Graham.....

[ Read Follow-ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Custody Reform Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by:

Jim Loose

on September 17, 2006 at 11:33:11:

Who cares about how "controlling" people claim their ex-spouses were? Why not be unhappy about how "anal" they were? Or whether or not their stars were in the right alignment? Maybe the bumps on their heads not being exactly the right size would be a good thing to argue about? How about their "blood"? Maybe it's really all about the tree spirits hanging around the neighborhood .................

It's a language game, Graham, and most people will always play whatever game happens to be going around at any one moment. It still means zippidy-doo-dah. It's calorie free bloviating and the more you do it the more confused you'll be too. It is not the way out of our problem, it's the way in. Can you imagine MLK trying to do his thing today? We'd stick him on the Dr. Phil Show and half a billion people would weep tears of joy when the good Dr. helped poor MLK have a "breakthrough" and then feel better about his Real Problem: the mean old white guy that wouldn't let him use a certain water fountain when he was six years old. MLK would feel alllllllll better and Jim Crow would go on and on and on.

Personally, if I had to have my life controlled by priests I'd take some who'd been around a while and make no claim to science versus acolytes of the Temple of Freud.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name / Nickname:
Email:

Subject:

Comments:

[ Read Follow-ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Custody Reform Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]