I think you misunderstood my point

[ Read Follow-ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Custody Reform Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by:

Roman

on October 27, 2006 at 06:48:35:

To be honest, my question had little to nothing to do with you, although your situation is what made me think of it. I was questioning the number of posters who are basically saying "it's none of mom's business - dad can do whatever he wants during visitation and can leave the kids with anyone he wants" I question them because of how often comments are made here about being denied ROFR, of their child being left with grandparents or other relatives instead of them being asked, of how often the CP is scrutinized for her behavior in reference to dad's contact, but as soon as it was an NCP facing the same situation, now it seems o.k. not to discuss and agree on terms with the other parent when you are not available. People here say all the time that mom has a duty to promote a relationship with child and dad, therefore, it would seem to me it should also be the other way around - even at the expense of a stepparent.

Personally, I hold nothing against you and your role as stepmom. My DH is a wonderful stepdad who would be crushed if the older two thought he loved them any less than his biological child. I agree a step can be just as loving as a real parent. BUT, I do not agree that a step is the "same" as a parent. You are NOT a parent. You are a STEPparent. In my opinion, that means you get to love the child as much as the parent, play the role of a parent, but always be willing to step aside to make room for the parent each and every time. I would imagine stepparenting is a pretty thankless job, and it takes a strong loving person to do it effectively.

Have you considered how the mom in your case feels about all of this? You say it's a control issue, but I have to wonder if because you do have such a great relationship with the child and your hubby supports you being his equal in the home, is there any chance you are making mom feel undermined and replaced? Not saying it would be intentional, but is it possible? Perhaps if you could address this and work to make sure she knows she will always be MOM and you have no intention of filling that role, she wouldn't feel the need to flex her parental muscles at you.

JMHO, of course.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name / Nickname:
Email:

Subject:

Comments:

[ Read Follow-ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Custody Reform Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]