Re: To TonyJames, To Gecko

[ Read Follow-ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Custody Reform Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by:

TonyJames

on May 22, 2007 at 15:37:06:

True, I was a putz. I had a very strong case, and I blew it in front of the judge.

Well this time she filed, but I have all my reciepts and my pictures that are dated, so her claim of me not showing up at visitation will not hold. What I did do was this in my answer:
1. AGREED
2. AGREED
3. AGREED
4. AGREED
5. AGREED
6. DENIED
7. DENIED
8. THE RESPONDENT AGREES THERE HAS BEEN A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES BUT DENIES ANY COMPELLING STATE INTEREST EXISTS TO REDUCE PARENTING TIME. IN RESPONSE TO THE PETITION OF MODIFICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER, THE RESPONDENT HEREBY REQUESTS JOINT PHYSICAL CARE SUBJECT TO A PARENTING PLAN WHICH WILL BE SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 598.41(5)(A).
9. DENIED
10. DENIED


WHEREFORE, RESPONDENT PRAYS, that the Petitioners Petition
for Modification of Default Dissolution Decree be dismissed at Petitioner’s
costs, the Respondent also prays that the Court will grant Respondent
Joint Physical Care of the parties’ minor child:

RESPONDENT FURTHER PRAYS, that he have and be given such other
and further relief as to the Court may be equitable in the premises.

Hopefully that will work out as planned. Would like to discuss this with you further if you would like to, via email of course.

BTW I tried the attorney thing, but trust me they got more expensive since 2004.
My email is as follows: lissa1968@iowatelecom.net

Thanks, TonyJames




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup:

Name / Nickname:
Email:

Subject:

Comments:

[ Read Follow-ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Custody Reform Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]